Learn, create, communicate and grow through English.
WEEK 12 · 3 HOURS
Final Presentation and Metacognition
Focus: Presentation · feedback · reflection
Present the Climate Action Proposal, answer questions and reflect on progress in academic argumentation.
Hour 1Input, visual explanation, listening
Hour 2Analysis, dialogue, interactive practice
Hour 3PC challenge, quiz, reflection
HOUR 1 · Input & Critical Comprehension60 MIN
Goal: Understand vocabulary, the visual concept and the listening message before producing academic language.
1A · Vocabulary Lab
Listen to every word. Choose four and create one climate-related sentence for each.
strength
fortaleza
Identify one strength in the argument.
weakness
debilidad
Recognize one weakness honestly.
feedback
retroalimentación
Use feedback to improve.
clarity
claridad
Ideas should be easy to follow.
fluency
fluidez
Speak clearly without rushing.
accuracy
precisión
Use grammar and vocabulary accurately.
reflection
reflexión
Reflection helps identify progress.
goal
meta
Set the next learning goal.
1B · Visual Explanation
Present, defend, improve
PRESENT the proposal, DEFEND key choices, receive FEEDBACK and REFLECT on what you can do now and what still needs work.
Example 1
Strength: The evidence clearly supports the proposal.
Example 2
Improvement: Explain the limitation more directly.
Example 3
Goal: Use conditionals more accurately in oral responses.
1C · Listening First, Transcript Later
Before listening: Predict three academic words you may hear.
Question: Which questions help students reflect on academic argumentation?
After presenting a climate proposal, students should be able to explain why they selected a solution, what evidence supports it and what limitations remain. Peer feedback should identify one strength and one specific improvement. Metacognition means asking: How can I argue better? Which grammar structures do I control? Which type of evidence do I still find difficult to evaluate?
Hour 1 · Evidence & Submission
HOUR 2 · Analysis & Academic Interaction60 MIN
Goal: Analyze examples, interact with a partner and apply the unit concept through decisions rather than copying.
2A · Guided Dialogues
Listen, perform one dialogue, then replace one example with a climate issue from school, Villavicencio or Colombia.
Dialogue 1
Observer: Your evidence was relevant, but the conclusion was too general.
Speaker: I will connect the conclusion more directly to the proposal.
Dialogue 2
Teacher: What improved most this trimester?
Student: I can now distinguish evidence from weak reasoning.
Dialogue 3
Partner: What is your next goal?
Student: I want to respond to questions with more fluency.
2B · Interactive Practice
Feedback type
Choose the best category. Then check your result before continuing.
2C · Pair Analysis & Submission
HOUR 3 · PC Challenge, Assessment & Reflection60 MIN
Goal: Apply the concept to a climate-action problem, complete the unit assessment and identify the next learning goal.
